The average citizen in the United States is accustomed to thinking of laws as something that are enacted by Congress–discussed, enacted, and signed into being. Nevertheless, the President also gives directives termed as executive orders, which tend to be laws. This leads to a very fundamental question that a lot of Americans still want to know; are executive orders law? Such is the nuance, and it becomes crucial knowledge in our country today as the political landscape is split apart and an executive order can change the policy of an entire nation with a scribing of the pen. To completely and clearly respond to this question, we will unpack the legal foundations, historical background as well as constitutional limits of executive orders in this blog.
Executive Orders- is it Law? Disaggregation of the president
Directly answering the question, are executive orders law, it is both a yes and a no answer. An executive order is not a law as would be understood in a common sense and as would be passed and enacted by Congress, but instead they are legally binding instructions issued by President in his capacity as recognized by the Constitution or congressional ruin laws.
The Constitutional Amendment of the U.S does not expressly accord the President powers to give executive orders. Despite this, Article II, Section 1 provides to the President that he or she shall have executive power and Section 3 that the President shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed. Based on these general provisions, executive orders find their power as a tool which can help to regulate the operations in the federal government.
This authority is however limited. Executive orders have to be based on the existing law or constitutional authority. They can be whittled or overturned by the courts or by the Congress in case they go over the mark. And these, although they do carry legal force, are not laws in the sense of the legislative process, and must conform to the scope of the U.S. law.
Historical situational: Executive Orders in the Ages
The use of executive orders is not new in governance of America. The initial executive order was put out in 1789 by President George Washington. Each president has used them since, with more or less scope and controversy. As an example, President Abraham Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation that was to prove to be a landmark executive order that reshaped the civil war and American society.
In the 20 th century, President Franklin D. Roosevelt made more than 3, 700 executive orders as his presidency progressed and made significant use of the executive orders to fight the Great Depression and World War II. Conversely, the use of executive orders has allowed contemporary presidents Barack Obama, Donald Trump, and Joe Biden to implement wholesale changes in the sphere of immigration, climate, and healthcare.
It is reflected in this rich history as to how executive orders have been developed as a very powerful tool of government. Nevertheless, their practices have always been tied to a legal scrutiny.
Criminality and Inability H2.
So, can executive orders become law on a layman American citizen still? Very likely, in most cases. As an example, an executive order to erase some student loans debts by President Biden affected millions of people. But, such an order had many challenges before law that later resulted in some parts being overruled by the supreme court. This becomes central to paint a very important picture: that executive orders may possess the force of law but are not beyond the law.
The most popular legal constraint was the decision of the Supreme Court that emerged in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer (1952). During the Korean War, president Truman tried to take over steel mills by an executive order. He lost the case and the Court cited that he had gone beyond his mandate as defined in the Constitution. The case predetermined a significant precedence in the form of a presidential powers check.
John Yoo, a legal scholar, says, indeed, the executive orders do not define the power of law; rather, their power is defined by the capabilities to execute the existing laws or rather their interpretation of the constitutional authority (Harvard Law Review).
Congressional and Judicial Checks
Even where the legislative process is sluggish in some cases, as such executive orders may jump or overstep the legislative process, it is not beyond checks and balances. Congress is able to check executive orders through denying funds to undertake the orders or through legislation defeating the orders. Naturally, to such legislation the President must sign or a veto-proof majority must approve.
There is one more essential role of the judicial branch. The courts have the right to check against any executive orders that may either go beyond the powers of the president or contravenes the constitutional rights of the citizens. This has been the case on a number of occasions in the recent years. The travel ban issued by President Trump was opposed by the court on a number of occasions until it was eventually revised and upheld. Likewise, the DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals) policy signed by President Obama through an executive order also experienced years of court grapplings.
Executive orders Vs. Other tools of the President
In order to conduct a complete understanding on the legality of executive orders, it is beneficial to separate executive orders with the other kind of presidential actions:
- Presidential Proclamations: These are less formal or even ceremonial in nature, though they may possess legal implications on a selective basis, e.g. designations of national monuments.
- Memoranda: These are the directives that are mostly issued internally by the government and it is not given the same seriousness as an executive order but can have a considerable impact on federal policy.
- Signing Statements: These give presidents an opportunity to indicate how he/she perceives a law when signing it, but it does not carry with it the force of law like an executive order.
Although both tools have defined purposes, executive orders are the ones that are used to enforce or execute the federal policies directly.
American Lives are affected
Be it knowingly or unknowingly, executive orders affect most daily activities. Whether it is concerning the military operations and foreign policy, in that case, they are crucial in setting the national agenda or whether it is the case of dealing with the issue of public health and setting up of environmental regulations, they play a critical role in setting the national agenda.
A case in point is the executive orders by President Trump in the regard of deregulation that resulted to the repeal of more than 100 environmental regulations. President Biden undid many of those through his executive orders of his own and indicating the elasticity, in addition, to inconsistency of this tool.
Such swift changes may cause ambiguity to businesses, states, and individuals. The result of such a dynamic makes many people question whether long-term policy should be based upon so much executive discretion. Anything that one administration does, the other undoes, after all.
politics of Executive Orders
As much as executive orders are modes of governance, they also act as a political strategy tool. Presidents also use them as a means of making campaign pledges happen quickly, or evidence of being bold when the rest of Congress is gridlocked. But the reliance on the executive orders might be the cause of accusations of authoritarianism or overstepping.
There are the accusations that there were simply too many executive orders and that they displace the legislative process by ensuring that too much power was allocated into the executive branch. The backers argue that they are essential means to slice the red tape in the bureaucracy to address critical matters.
The perception by the population usually depends on political affiliation. A voter may agree to executive orders by the president he or she voted and disagree with it as overreach by the president he or she disagrees with.
Are execu-tive orders law or mere guidelines?
Finally, are executive orders strictly speaking law? No, they are not legislations enacted by the Congress. They are, however, enforceable by law, as far as it lies within the constraints of the Constitution and current laws. They have actual strength and real impact and are constrained by an effective system of checks and balances.
Conclusion: To Know the Limits, Respect the Power
Executive order is a part and parcel of a presidential arsenal, it gives the president a chance to act quickly in any time of an emergency or standoffs. Nevertheless, it is essential to know their status towards their legal relationship with an informed citizenry. Although they are no laws per se, executive orders hold the strength to influence policy and regulation and transform lives of millions. They are a commerce between command and restraint.
It seems more necessary than ever in an era of political polarisation when the boundaries of who holds power become nebulous, that we pose relevant inquiries such as the one concerning whether executive orders are law or not. To understand the answer is to understand what American democracy is all about and that, my friends is up to us all.
you may also like
Steve Napolitano Political Party: A View on His Political Life and Impact
